Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs GRID P40-3Q
Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank 183 and the GRID P40-3Q is on rank 341, so the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-3Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $5,699), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2678.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2678.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and GRID P40-3Q
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,570+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+150% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+350% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-3Q has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Tesla NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | Tesla NVENC x24 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | Tesla NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3+69% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 costs 96.5% less ($5499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 2566.7% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000-82% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-96% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0+2567% | 1.2 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GK104 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #331 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 7130 and GRID P40-3Q
