
Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Radeon Pro 570

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank 183 and the Radeon Pro 570 is on rank 78, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 570.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $200), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 97.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Radeon Pro 570

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406+1% | 6,337 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+45% | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz+12% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+29% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 8% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 120W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 52.8+7% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 98.1% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $300-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $100-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0 | 63.4+98% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Polaris 20 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #331 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















