Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Quadro T1000
Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank 183 and the Quadro T1000 is on rank 90, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T1000 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $425 for the Quadro T1000, it costs 53% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 109.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+109.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($425) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Quadro T1000
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,505+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 1455 MHz+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 130.1+164% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400 and now averages $425. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 costs 52.9% less ($225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 15.3 (Quadro T1000) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 109.2% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $400-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-53% | $425 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0+109% | 15.3 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | TU117 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #331 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Quadro T1000
