Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Quadro M4000
Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank 183 and the Quadro M4000 is on rank 159, so the Quadro M4000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 7130.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $350), it costs 43% less, resulting in a 67.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Quadro M4000
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Quadro M4000 reaches 6,679 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,679+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+80% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+129% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz+23% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144+80% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+20% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 82°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 66.8+35% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791 and now averages $350. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 costs 42.9% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 19.1 (Quadro M4000) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 67.5% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $791-21% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-43% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0+68% | 19.1 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GM204 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #331 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Quadro M4000
