
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon RX 5500M

Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5500M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 5500M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $100 for the Radeon RX 5500M, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 70.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+70.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and Radeon RX 5500M

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100+2% | 5,954 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1645 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500M has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 5500M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 80.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 85W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5 | 70.0+130% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 280X costs 40% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 70.9% better value. The Radeon RX 5500M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-40% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 101.7+71% | 59.5 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 14 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #404 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















