Ryzen 3 210
VS
Core i7-9700F

Ryzen 3 210 vs Core i7-9700F

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700F

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
107%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700F

#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
106%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
106%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
105%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
42%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
105%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
42%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
104%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
104%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
102%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
34%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
101%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
101%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
101%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
100%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
100%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
100%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
25%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
23%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
98%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
98%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
20%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 210 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 210Core i7-9700F
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($99)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-9700F (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 210Core i7-9700F
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+103%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($99)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 210 and Core i7-9700F

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-9700F

The Core i7-9700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $323.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-9700F offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-9700F — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i7-9700F uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Core i7-9700F's 13,165 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 210. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700F.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core i7-9700F
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
13,209
13,165
Cinebench R23 Multi
515
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-9700F uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core i7-9700F
Socket
FP7
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) / not specified (Core i7-9700F). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core i7-9700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core i7-9700F
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 3 210 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700F debuted at $323. At current prices ($99 vs $200), the Ryzen 3 210 is $101 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 210 delivers 133.4 pts/$ vs 65.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700F — making the Ryzen 3 210 the 67.9% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core i7-9700F
MSRP
$99-69%
$323
Avg Price (30d)
$99-51%
$200
Performance per Dollar
133.4+103%
65.8
Release Date
2025
2019