Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Silver 4310

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Silver 4310 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

12 / 24

22,066

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Silver 4310

12 / 24

21,903

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Silver 4310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Silver 4310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4310 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4310

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,903 vs 22,066).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920 better than Xeon Silver 4310?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $799 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Silver 4310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4310

The Xeon Silver 4310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,903 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon Silver 4310 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4310 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4310 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 scores 22,066 against the Xeon Silver 4310's 21,903 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4310.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1920	Xeon Silver 4310
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+15%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+52%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+78%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	22,066	21,903

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4310 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.