Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1060

Intel

Arc A350M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······

Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A350M

2022

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 25W instead of 180W, a 155W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 159.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 620% higher power demand at 180W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 159.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 123.6% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 4,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A350M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A350M scores 4,500 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 123.6%. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
4,500
10,064+124%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Pascal
Process Node
6 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
768
2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.766 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+402%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1733 MHz+51%
ROPs
24
64+167%
TMUs
48
160+233%
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+17%
0.94 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A350M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
192 GB/s+71%
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureArc A350MGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
Intel Media Engine
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
Intel Media Engine
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 151.2% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
25W-86%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
0mm
173mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
180.0+222%
55.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2016).

FeatureArc A350MGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$249
Codename
DG2-128
GP104
Release
March 30 2022
May 27 2016
Ranking
#418
#137

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.