Arc A350M
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A350M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅111.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A350M scores 4,500 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 138.9%. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A350M) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 10,749+139% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.766 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+284% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1470 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 72+50% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 2.3 MB+109% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 18+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A350M) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 168 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Media Engine | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | Intel Media Engine | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 94.7% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-64% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 160mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+17% | 153.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GA107 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #418 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A350M and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
