Arc A350M
GeForce RTX 4070
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A350M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅360.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A350M scores 4,500 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 498.2%. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A350M) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 184.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 26,919+498% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5888+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.766 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+1551% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 2475 MHz+115% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 48 | 184+283% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 5.8 MB+427% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 46+667% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A350M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A350M) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 350% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 504 GB/s+350% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | Intel Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 155.6% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-88% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+34% | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | AD104 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #418 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A350M and GeForce RTX 4070
