Arc A350M vs Tesla K20m Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A350M vs Tesla K20m FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc A350M vs Tesla K20m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A350M
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A350M vs Tesla K20m Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).
| Feature | Arc A350M | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500+2% | 4,432 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2496+225% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.766 TFLOPS | 3.524 TFLOPS+100% |
| ROPs | 24 | 40+67% |
| TMUs | 48 | 208+333% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+450% | 0.2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+220% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A350M | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20m carries 2 GB. Arc A350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 64-bit on the Tesla K20m. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+220% | 1.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 160% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+814% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc A350M | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3199 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GK110 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | January 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #418 | #470 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A350M and Tesla K20m
