Arc A750
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅5.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $511 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 15.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Arc A750 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌176.8% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1305 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,357 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) reaches 12,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.843 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1485 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) with 448 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600+2% | 12,357 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+151% | 6.843 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+62% | 1485 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 36+29% |
| Tensor Cores | 448+56% | 288 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel). L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+14% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)'s 115W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 115W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 268mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-8% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 107.5+92% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) launched at $800. On MSRP, Arc A750 was 63.9% cheaper ($511 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 15.4 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) — the Arc A750 offers 183.1% better value. The newer card here is Arc A750 (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-64% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6+183% | 15.4 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU106B |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 29 2019 |
| Ranking | #212 | #195 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
