Arc A750
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅52.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌71% HIGHER MSRP$289 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.
- ❌67.5% longer card at 268mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 268mm, a 108mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the Arc A750 leads by 17.2%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 448 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600+17% | 10,749 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+154% | 6.774 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+63% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+250% | 32 |
| TMUs | 224+211% | 72 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+56% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 448+522% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. Arc A750 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 204.8% advantage for the Arc A750. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+205% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs None. Card length: 268mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 70W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | None |
| Length | 268mm | 160mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 153.6+174% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 41.5% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 45.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $169-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6 | 63.6+46% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA107 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #212 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
