Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4070

Intel

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
Arc family
···
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
RTX family
·······

Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $310 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Measures 268mm instead of 304mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • 42.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 13.4% longer card at 304mm vs 268mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 113.6% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 12,600), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Arc A750 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 6nm, and 46 vs 28 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $310 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.1% (44.9 vs 43.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 113.6%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 448 Tensor cores vs 184.

FeatureArc A750GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score
12,600
26,919+114%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
6 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
3584
5888+64%
Compute (TFLOPS)
17.2 TFLOPS
29.15 TFLOPS+69%
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2475 MHz+3%
ROPs
112+75%
64
TMUs
224+22%
184
L2 Cache
16 MB
36 MB+125%
Ray Tracing Cores
28
46+64%
Tensor Cores
448+143%
184

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A750 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A750GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 1.6% advantage for the Arc A750. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A750GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
12 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+2%
504 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB
36 MB+125%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A750GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

FeatureArc A750GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder
Dual Xe Media Engine
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

FeatureArc A750GeForce RTX 4070
TDP
225W
200W-11%
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
8-pin + 6-pin
8-pin
Length
268mm
304mm
Height
137mm
Slots
2-33%
3
Temp (Load)
78°C-3%
80°C
Perf/Watt
56.0
134.6+140%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, Arc A750 was 51.8% cheaper ($310 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).

FeatureArc A750GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP
$289-52%
$599
Performance per Dollar
43.6
44.9+3%
Codename
DG2-512
AD104
Release
October 12 2022
April 12 2023
Ranking
#212
#32

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.