Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Arc Graphics 130T vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

2025
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

Arc Graphics 130T vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 130T
Shared 15
6,208
0.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
6 GB 70
10,749
+73.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 770
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130T vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,208 vs 10,749).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌
    77.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅+73.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 207.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 73.1% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 6,208), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of Unknown node, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $131 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 207.4% (63.6 vs 20.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc Graphics 130T vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 73.1%. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
6,208
10,749+73%
Architecture
Xe+
Ampere
Shading Units
7
2304+32814%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 130T leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130T and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
Shared
6 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
168 GB/s
Bus Width
System
96-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 129.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
15W-79%
70W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
0mm
160mm
Height
0mm
—
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
413.9+169%
153.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 130T came in at $300, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 43.7% cheaper ($131 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 207.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130T (2025 vs 2024).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$300
$169-44%
Performance per Dollar
20.7
63.6+207%
Codename
—
GA107
Release
January 6 2025
February 2 2024
Ranking
#386
#252
Search Arc Graphics 130T on AmazonSearch GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.