Atom C3758
VS
Ryzen 5 3600

Atom C3758 vs Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Atom C3758

8 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom C3758 is positioned at rank #585 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3758

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9008%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1701%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1511%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1167%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
99%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
98%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
96%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
96%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
95%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
94%
#585
Atom C3758
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
98%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
96%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1410%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1332%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
967%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
291%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
231%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
202%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
116%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
114%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
103%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
100%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
99%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
98%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
97%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
95%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
93%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
92%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
91%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
91%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
88%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
85%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
85%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
85%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
83%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
83%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 5 3600 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom C3758 in both compute-intensive tasks (117.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom C3758Ryzen 5 3600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom C3758Ryzen 5 3600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3758 and Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Atom C3758 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 62.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 117.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 1,295, a 105.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,400 vs 1,898 (23.4% advantage for the Atom C3758). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureAtom C3758Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
4.2 GHz+91%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz+64%
L3 Cache
16 MB
32 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
16 MB+3100%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
4,614
17,685+283%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
400
1,295+224%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,400+26%
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Atom C3758) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Atom C3758) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

FeatureAtom C3758Ryzen 5 3600
Socket
FCBGA1310
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureAtom C3758Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Server/Embedded
Gaming/Budget Workstation