Celeron D 352 vs Core i5-12400F

Intel

Celeron D 352

1 Cores1 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Core family
·······

Celeron D 352 vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron D 352 vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron D 352 vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

  • Costs $105 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (418 vs 19,532).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • 29.2% higher power demand at 84W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA775, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +1940.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 1753.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 84W, a 19W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA775 and older memory support.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 152.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $174 MSRPvs$69 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Celeron D 352?
Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1940.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4572.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1940.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 4572.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in 152.2% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1940.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1753.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 6.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2006), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA775, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 1/1. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron D 352 vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The Celeron D 352 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 191.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 1,700, a 161.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron D 352 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureCeleron D 352Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
6 / 12+500%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.4 GHz+38%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+28%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process
65 nm
Intel 7 nm-89%
Architecture
Cedar Mill (2006)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
418
19,532+4573%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
180
1,700+844%
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron D 352 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 500% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron D 352) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

FeatureCeleron D 352Core i5-12400F
Socket
LGA775
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
800
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+500%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: false (Celeron D 352) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCeleron D 352Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron D 352 was priced at $69, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($69 vs $174), Celeron D 352 was $105 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron D 352 delivers 6.1 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 179.5% better value option.

FeatureCeleron D 352Core i5-12400F
MSRP
$69-60%
$174
Performance per Dollar
6.1
112.3+1741%
Release Date
2006
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.