Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-10400F

Intel

Celeron G3930TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $118 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (948 vs 5,783).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +244.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
  • βœ…Delivers 54.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 52.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G3930TE.

Trade-offs

  • ❌
    281% HIGHER MSRP
    $160 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
  • ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Celeron G3930TE?
Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 244.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 510% better Geekbench multi-core, 487.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 244.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 510% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in 281.0% more expensive on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 244.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 54.2% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 52.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

⚑

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β€” the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F β€” a 45.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 β€” a 141.8% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 548 vs 1,454, a 90.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 5,783 (143.7% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore i5-10400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
4.3 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
2.9 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12 MB (total)+500%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019)
Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025)
PassMark
2,218
13,029+487%
Cinebench R23 Multi
β€”
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
548
1,454+165%
Geekbench 6 Multi
948
5,783+510%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930TE versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F β€” the Core i5-10400F supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β€” 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore i5-10400F
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2666+11%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore i5-10400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
β€”
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Gaming
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930TE was priced at $42, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($42 vs $160), Celeron G3930TE was $118 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930TE delivers 52.8 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F β€” making the Core i5-10400F the 42.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore i5-10400F
MSRP
$42-74%
$160
Performance per Dollar
52.8
81.4+54%
Release Date
2017
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.