
Celeron G3930TE

Ryzen 9 5900X
Celeron G3930TE vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930TE vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3930TE vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930TE
2017Why buy it
- β Costs $507 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (948 vs 11,888).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +447.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +3100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 2 MB).
- β Delivers 34.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 52.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- β 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β1207.1% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
- β200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Celeron G3930TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930TE vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE
The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X β a 56% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 β a 178.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 548 vs 2,174, a 119.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 11,888 (170.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 12 / 24+500% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+78% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz+37% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 2,218 | 38,955+1656% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 548 | 2,174+297% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | 11,888+1154% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930TE versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X β the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930TE) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) β the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3930TE was priced at $42, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($42 vs $549), Celeron G3930TE was $507 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930TE delivers 52.8 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X β making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 29.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-92% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | 71.0+34% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














