Celeron SU2300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

Celeron SU2300

10 WW2009

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron SU2300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Celeron SU2300

545

0.0%

22,430

+4015.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron SU2300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron SU2300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 22,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1671.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Delivers 1576.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 4.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
145.5% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$134 MSRP
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron SU2300?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1671.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4015.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1671.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 4015.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 145.5% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1671.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1576.3% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 4.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2009) and 3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron SU2300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 190.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	—	8 / 16
Boost Clock	—	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+200%
L3 Cache	1 MB	32 MB+3100%
L2 Cache	—	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-84%
Architecture	—	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	545	22,430+4016%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	BGA956	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron SU2300 was priced at $134, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($134 vs $329), Celeron SU2300 was $195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron SU2300 delivers 4.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 177.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$134-59%	$329
Performance per Dollar	4.1	68.2+1563%
Release Date	2009	2019

Search Celeron SU2300 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.