EPYC 4345P
Xeon Platinum 8268
EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Platinum 8268 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Platinum 8268 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Platinum 8268: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4345P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,973 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1866.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
- ✅71.4% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4345P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 36,006).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 4345P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4345P better than Xeon Platinum 8268?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Platinum 8268 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4345P
The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.
Xeon Platinum 8268
The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4345P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 34% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 4345P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4345P scores 36,006 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 4345P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4345P vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | EPYC 4345P | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+41% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+31% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 35.75 MB (total)+12% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 36,006+3% | 35,081 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,046 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4345P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4345P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the EPYC 4345P supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8268 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4345P) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4345P) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) — the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4345P) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).
| Feature | EPYC 4345P | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+91% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 4345P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). The EPYC 4345P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.
| Feature | EPYC 4345P | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | High-end Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4345P was priced at $329, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 came in at $6302. On launch pricing ($329 vs $6302), EPYC 4345P was $5973 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4345P delivers 109.4 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8268 — making the EPYC 4345P the 180.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4345P | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-95% | $6302 |
| Performance per Dollar | 109.4+1854% | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4345P and Xeon Platinum 8268
