PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4564P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Ryzen 9 7950X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $818 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (37,452 vs 38,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4564P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 4564P

2024

Ryzen 9 7950X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $818 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (37,452 vs 38,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4564P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4564P better than Ryzen 9 7950X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4564P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4564P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 34.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4564P is the better fit. You are getting 2.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4564P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 9 7950X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 4564P is 117.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,517 MSRP versus $699 MSRP, and it gives you a 34.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 9 7950X is also 110.1% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 42.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4564P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 4564P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7950X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 4564P	Ryzen 9 7950X
1080p
low	289 FPS	302 FPS
medium	262 FPS	272 FPS
high	216 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	271 FPS	281 FPS
medium	223 FPS	230 FPS
high	173 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	153 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	194 FPS
medium	153 FPS	161 FPS
high	118 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	109 FPS

Open EPYC 4564P Open Ryzen 9 7950X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 4564P	Ryzen 9 7950X
1080p
low	765 FPS	807 FPS
medium	631 FPS	660 FPS
high	468 FPS	518 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	448 FPS
1440p
low	628 FPS	668 FPS
medium	537 FPS	567 FPS
high	412 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	353 FPS	373 FPS
medium	305 FPS	320 FPS
high	267 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	253 FPS

Open EPYC 4564P Open Ryzen 9 7950X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 4564P	Ryzen 9 7950X
1080p
low	1025 FPS	732 FPS
medium	1139 FPS	590 FPS
high	1058 FPS	510 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	398 FPS
1440p
low	971 FPS	614 FPS
medium	858 FPS	500 FPS
high	772 FPS	425 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	338 FPS
4K
low	596 FPS	435 FPS
medium	518 FPS	372 FPS
high	465 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	261 FPS

Open EPYC 4564P Open Ryzen 9 7950X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 4564P	Ryzen 9 7950X
1080p
low	1294 FPS	1002 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	882 FPS
high	982 FPS	764 FPS
ultra	855 FPS	685 FPS
1440p
low	1021 FPS	814 FPS
medium	890 FPS	700 FPS
high	764 FPS	604 FPS
ultra	640 FPS	517 FPS
4K
low	756 FPS	593 FPS
medium	659 FPS	519 FPS
high	571 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	387 FPS

Open EPYC 4564P Open Ryzen 9 7950X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4564P and Ryzen 9 7950X

EPYC 4564P

The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.

Ryzen 9 7950X

The Ryzen 9 7950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-09-27. It is based on the Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,343 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4564P and Ryzen 9 7950X share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X uses Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the Ryzen 9 7950X's 62,343 — a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 4564P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,500 vs 37,452 (2.8% advantage for the EPYC 4564P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,975 vs 2,976, a 0% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,581 vs 19,297 (3.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X). Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 4564P	Ryzen 9 7950X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz	5.7 GHz
Base Clock	4.5 GHz	4.5 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Raphael (Zen 4) (2022)
PassMark	64,387+3%	62,343
Cinebench R23 Multi	38,500+3%	37,452
Geekbench 6 Single	2,975	2,976
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,581	19,297+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4564P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 7950X) — the EPYC 4564P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X).

Feature	EPYC 4564P	Ryzen 9 7950X
Socket	AM5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28+17%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4564P) and Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) (Ryzen 9 7950X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Ryzen 9 7950X rivals Core i9-13900K.

Feature	EPYC 4564P	Ryzen 9 7950X
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	true
Target Use	High-end Server / Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4564P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X debuted at $699. On MSRP ($1517 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X is $818 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X — making the Ryzen 9 7950X the 71% better value option.