EPYC 4564P
Xeon Platinum 8454H
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4564P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,023 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 345.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 270W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Platinum 8454H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 83 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8454H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+28.9% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,347 vs 64,387).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($6,540 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌58.8% higher power demand at 270W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4564P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4564P better than Xeon Platinum 8454H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.
Xeon Platinum 8454H
The Xeon Platinum 8454H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 62,347 points. Launch price was $6,540.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4564P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8454H has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — a 50.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the Xeon Platinum 8454H's 62,347 — a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 4564P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8454H.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+68% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+114% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 82.5 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 64,387+3% | 62,347 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,975 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,581 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — the EPYC 4564P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8454H supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) — the Xeon Platinum 8454H offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8454H).
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+8% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8454H). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon Platinum 8454H rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Server / Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4564P was priced at $1517, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H came in at $6540. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $6540), EPYC 4564P was $5023 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8454H — making the EPYC 4564P the 126.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-77% | $6540 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.4+346% | 9.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4564P and Xeon Platinum 8454H
