EPYC 7C13 vs Core i5-13400F
EPYC 7C13
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7C13
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7C13 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,000) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7C13 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+264%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,000) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7C13 and Core i5-13400F
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 54 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 101.3% lead for the EPYC 7C13. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,538 vs 2,407, a 44.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 37,000 vs 11,408 (105.7% advantage for the EPYC 7C13). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+540% | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4.6 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+1180% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 76,363+205% | 25,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,538 | 2,407+57% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 37,000+224% | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7C13 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7C13) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7C13) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+2033% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+540% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7C13 launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($2000 vs $180), the Core i5-13400F is $1820 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 113.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $196-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $180-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2 | 139.1+264% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7C13 and Core i5-13400F
