EPYC 9374F vs Xeon 6740E

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon 6740E Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9374F

32 / 64

82,009

+7.7%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon 6740E

96 / 96

76,167

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon 6740E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon 6740E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9374F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Costs $415 less on MSRP ($4,850 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌28% higher power demand at 320W vs 250W.

Xeon 6740E

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 250W instead of 320W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (76,167 vs 82,009).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9374F better than Xeon 6740E?

Yes. EPYC 9374F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 36.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 7.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9374F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 36.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9374F is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9374F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9374F comes in $415 cheaper on MSRP at $4,850 MSRP versus $5,265 MSRP, and it still gives you a 36.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.9% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 14.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6740E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9374F vs Xeon 6740E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

Xeon 6740E

The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6740E offers 96 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740E has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E — a 29.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6740E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Xeon 6740E's 76,167 — a 7.4% lead for the EPYC 9374F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon 6740E
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	96 / 96+200%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+34%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+60%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+167%	96 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4 MB (per module)+300%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sierra Forest (2024)
PassMark	82,009+8%	76,167

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus 6400 on the Xeon 6740E — the Xeon 6740E supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 8 (Xeon 6740E). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9374F) vs 80 (Xeon 6740E) — the EPYC 9374F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and C741 (Xeon 6740E).

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon 6740E
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6740E). Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon 6740E
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, TDX

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9374F was priced at $4850, while the Xeon 6740E came in at $5265. On launch pricing ($4850 vs $5265), EPYC 9374F was $415 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740E — making the EPYC 9374F the 15.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9374F	Xeon 6740E
MSRP	$4850-8%	$5265
Performance per Dollar	16.9+17%	14.5
Release Date	2022	2024

Search EPYC 9374F on Amazon

Search Xeon 6740E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.