FirePro M4150
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
FirePro M4150 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4150 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro M4150 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4150
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,011 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌18.3% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+963.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1158.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4150 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro M4150
The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 963.2%. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,011 | 10,749+963% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2304+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+1134% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 72+200% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 2.3 MB+2456% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M4150 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M4150) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4150) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 160mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 153.6+2193% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 15.5% cheaper ($31 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1147.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $169-16% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 63.6+1147% |
| Codename | Opal | GA107 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #879 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M4150 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
