FirePro W600 vs Radeon RX Vega 9
FirePro W600
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega 9
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W600 is positioned at rank 253 and the Radeon RX Vega 9 is on rank 279, so the FirePro W600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega 9
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 9.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | Radeon RX Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Vega (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 70.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W600 | Radeon RX Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+70.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W600 and Radeon RX Vega 9
FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon RX Vega 9
The Radeon RX Vega 9 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 1300 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,661 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the Radeon RX Vega 9 reaches 1,661 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 9 uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 576 (Radeon RX Vega 9).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon RX Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695+2% | 1,661 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 576+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon RX Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 9 has 0 MB. The FirePro W600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon RX Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega 9's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 9 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 9). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon RX Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6 | 110.7+390% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon RX Vega 9 launched at $99 and now averages $50. The FirePro W600 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.5 (FirePro W600) vs 33.2 (Radeon RX Vega 9) — the FirePro W600 offers 70.2% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 9 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | Radeon RX Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $99-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5+70% | 33.2 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | June 13 2012 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #732 | #670 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W600 and Radeon RX Vega 9
