FirePro W9000
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
FirePro W9000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W9000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W9000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,157 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2266.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+74.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $3,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4031.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 74.6%. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157 | 10,749+75% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+70% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+78% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2.3 MB+360% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9000 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 118.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 279mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 93°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 70W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 279mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | 75°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 153.6+583% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W9000 came in at $3999, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 95.8% cheaper ($3830 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro W9000) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 4140% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $169-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 63.6+4140% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA107 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #390 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W9000 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
