Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1060

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.5 GB 50
1,726
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 645M
brand logoGeForce 940M
brand logoGeForce GTS 450
brand logoGeForce 940MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoTITAN V
GeForce GTX 1060
6 GB 180
10,064
+483.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low12 FPS
medium8 FPS
high5 FPS
ultra3 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low117 FPS
medium105 FPS
high91 FPS
ultra77 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low37 FPS
medium18 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low216 FPS
medium181 FPS
high148 FPS
ultra113 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low78 FPS
medium62 FPS
high52 FPS
ultra39 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low453 FPS
medium362 FPS
high302 FPS
ultra226 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low56 FPS
medium45 FPS
high29 FPS
ultra21 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low358 FPS
medium302 FPS
high260 FPS
ultra226 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high52 FPS
ultra39 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low6 FPS
medium3 FPS
high2 FPS
ultra2 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low237 FPS
medium218 FPS
high193 FPS
ultra177 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low5 FPS
medium4 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low92 FPS
medium73 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low29 FPS
medium18 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low128 FPS
medium104 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra70 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low53 FPS
medium44 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra18 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low107 FPS
medium91 FPS
high69 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
low6 FPS
medium4 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low122 FPS
medium101 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra72 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅746.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 368.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 746.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 483.1% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 1,726), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 more expensive on MSRP at $249 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 368.3% (40.4 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 483.1%. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
1,726
10,064+483%
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
384
2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8333 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+965%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
160+400%
L1 Cache
32 KB
960 KB+2900%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
192 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 113% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
50W-72%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
—
173mm
Height
—
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
—
Perf/Watt
34.5
55.9+62%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition was 19.7% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 369.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$200-20%
$249
Performance per Dollar
8.6
40.4+370%
Codename
GK107
GP104
Release
November 8 2013
May 27 2016
Ranking
#925
#137
Search GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.