G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅1064.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 657.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1064.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1032.6% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 1,726), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 657.6% (65.4 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1032.6%. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score	1,726	19,548+1033%
Architecture	Kepler	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384	3072+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8333 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS+1713%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	0.03 MB	3 MB+9900%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	24 MB+9500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	8 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	272 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	24 MB+9500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 78.8% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 73°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce RTX 4060
TDP	50W-57%	115W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	73°C-14%
Perf/Watt	34.5	170.0+393%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition came in at $200, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition was 33.1% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 660.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP	$200-33%	$299
Performance per Dollar	8.6	65.4+660%
Codename	GK107	AD107
Release	November 8 2013	May 18 2023
Ranking	#925	#84

Search GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.