GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

2013Core: 1085 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is positioned at rank #388 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

#378
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1258%
#380
1140%
#381
1137%
#385
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1034%
#386
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1027%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
100%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
97%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#399
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
93%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1076.8% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition.

InsightGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1076.8%)
Leading raw performance (+1076.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 110.1% better value per dollar than the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition.

InsightGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+110.1%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition scores 1,726 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1076.8%. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
1,726
20,312+1077%
Architecture
Kepler
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
384
4864+1167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8333 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS+1844%
ROPs
16
80+400%
TMUs
32
152+375%
L1 Cache
0.03 MB
4.8 MB+15900%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
448 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
50W-75%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
34.5
101.6+194%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition costs 82.1% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 110.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M Mac EditionGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$200-50%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$50-82%
$280
Performance per Dollar
34.5
72.5+110%
Codename
GK107
GA104
Release
November 8 2013
December 1 2020
Ranking
#925
#73