GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
VS
GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

2018Core: 1392 MHzBoost: 1518 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 175.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-175.9%)
Leading raw performance (+175.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 37.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+37.9%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 175.9%. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1518 MHz vs 1680 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score
5,116
14,114+176%
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
768
1920+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.332 TFLOPS
6.451 TFLOPS+177%
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
1680 MHz+11%
ROPs
24
48+100%
TMUs
48
120+150%
L1 Cache
0.28 MB
1.9 MB+579%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
3 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
6 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
84 GB/s
336 GB/s+300%
Bus Width
96-bit
192-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
3 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 3.0 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
NVDEC 3.0
NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 72.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
TDP
75W-53%
160W
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
8-pin
Length
145mm
229mm
Height
111mm
113mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
65-10%
72
Perf/Watt
68.2
88.2+29%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB costs 50% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 85.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 37.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce RTX 2060
MSRP
$129-63%
$349
Avg Price (30d)
$60-50%
$120
Performance per Dollar
85.3
117.6+38%
Codename
GP107
TU106
Release
May 21 2018
January 7 2019
Ranking
#440
#168