GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GeForce RTX 3070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GeForce RTX 3070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GeForce RTX 3070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 242mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅354.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 12% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 242mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GeForce RTX 3070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 333.4%. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1518 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,116 | 22,172+333% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5888+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.332 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+771% |
| Boost Clock | 1518 MHz | 1725 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 24 | 96+300% |
| TMUs | 48 | 184+283% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 5.8 MB+1971% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 433.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 84 GB/s | 448 GB/s+433% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 3.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.2 | 100.8+48% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB came in at $129, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 74.1% cheaper ($370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 11.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-74% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | 44.4+12% |
| Codename | GP107 | GA104 |
| Release | May 21 2018 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #440 | #63 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and GeForce RTX 3070
