
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 211mm instead of 235mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅120.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
- ❌11.4% longer card at 235mm vs 211mm.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 211mm instead of 235mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅120.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
- ❌11.4% longer card at 235mm vs 211mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 87.3%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 11,892+87% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+320% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 1755 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 2.5 MB+793% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 224 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 60% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 211mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-46% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 211mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 43.8% less ($109 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 5.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-44% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4 | 47.8+5% |
| Codename | GP107 | GA106 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #381 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













