GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 23.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-23.9%)
Leading raw performance (+23.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $65), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 7.4% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+7.4%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($65)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 23.9%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
6,350
7,869+24%
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
768
896+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.138 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock
1392 MHz
1665 MHz+20%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
56+17%
L1 Cache
288 KB
896 KB+211%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
128 GB/s+14%
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12_1
12
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 211mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
70W-7%
75W
Recommended PSU
300W
300W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
211mm
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
90.7
104.9+16%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 13.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 7.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$140-6%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$65-13%
$75
Performance per Dollar
97.7
104.9+7%
Codename
GP107
TU117
Release
October 25 2016
April 23 2019
Ranking
#381
#323