GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
VS
GeForce GTX 670

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GeForce GTX 670

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 670.

InsightGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 670
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and GeForce GTX 670

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670

The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the GeForce GTX 670 reaches 5,361 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 670 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 980 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 670
G3D Mark Score
5,474+2%
5,361
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344
1344
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS
2.634 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
980 MHz
980 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112
112
L1 Cache
112 KB
112 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 670
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 670
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
192 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 670
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs NVDEC (1st Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 670
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC
NVENC (3rd Gen)
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
NVDEC (1st Gen)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 670's 170W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 670). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 82 C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 670
TDP
170W
170W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
241mm
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
82 C-4%
Perf/Watt
32.2+2%
31.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 670
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Codename
GK104
GK104
Release
September 27 2013
May 10 2012
Ranking
#417
#424