
GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $249), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 713.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+713.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,307+2% | 5,200 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+543% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS+307% | 1.312 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+20% | 40 |
| TMUs | 240+329% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 896 KB+273% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+138% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — a 23.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+23% | 156 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 320-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+138% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (FL 11_0)+9% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo VP4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3rd Gen | UVD 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 17.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 210W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 76°C |
| Perf/Watt | 21.2 | 24.8+17% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 88% less ($219 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 713.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-14% | $289 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249 | $30-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3 | 173.3+714% |
| Codename | GK110B | GF110 |
| Release | November 7 2013 | November 29 2011 |
| Ranking | #278 | #571 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















