GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 560

GeForce MX350

2020Core: 747 MHzBoost: 937 MHz

GeForce GTX 560

2011Core: 810 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce MX350

2,828

+2.2%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 560

150

2,768

0.0%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX350 is positioned at rank #348 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350

#338

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

960%

#340

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

870%

#341

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

868%

#345

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

789%

#346

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

784%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

100%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#350

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

98%

#351

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

98%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

96%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

94%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

94%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

93%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX350 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The GeForce MX350 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560.

Insight	GeForce MX350	GeForce GTX 560
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $200 for the GeForce MX350, it costs 85% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 552.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce MX350	GeForce GTX 560
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+552.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX350 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX350 and GeForce GTX 560

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce GTX 560
G3D Mark Score	2,828+2%	2,768
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+90%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.199 TFLOPS+10%	1.089 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	240 KB	448 KB+87%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce GTX 560
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX350 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB. The GeForce MX350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce GTX 560
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	56 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce GTX 560
TDP	20W-87%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	Mobile	2x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	141.4+664%	18.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX350 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 85% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.1 (GeForce MX350) vs 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 554.6% better value. The GeForce MX350 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).