CPU
GPU
GeForce3 Ti 200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is positioned at rank #382 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 434900% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce3 Ti 200.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-434900%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+434900%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 200 and GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 17,400 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 434900%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) with 368 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 17,400+434900% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 4352+48% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+119% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2535 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+35% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 4.3 MB+48% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+35% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+171% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce3 Ti 200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 12 Ultimate+48% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.6+254% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: None vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 160W — a 29.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 160W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 183mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60-25% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 108.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | TU104 | AD106 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #94 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce3 Ti 200 and GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
