GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce3 Ti 200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is positioned at rank #382 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 554200% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce3 Ti 200.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-554200%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+554200%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 135703.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce3 Ti 200.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+135703.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 200 and GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 554200%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 368 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 22,172+554200% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 5888+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+102% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 5.8 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+100% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 12 Ultimate+48% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.6+254% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: None vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 2.3% difference. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 183mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W-2% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 183mm | 242mm |
| Height | 100mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce3 Ti 200 costs 75.5% less ($151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 110800% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-70% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-76% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 110.9+110800% |
| Codename | TU104 | GA104 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #94 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce3 Ti 200 and GeForce RTX 3070
