GeForce3 Ti 200 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce3 Ti 200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is positioned at rank #382 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 507700% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce3 Ti 200.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-507700%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+507700%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 88765% better value per dollar than the GeForce3 Ti 200.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+88765%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 200 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 507700%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 368 Tensor cores vs 152.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 20,312+507700% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 4864+65% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+3% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 184+21% | 152 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 4.8 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+21% | 38 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+142% | 152 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+48% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.6+254% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: None vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 7.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 183mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 200W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 183mm | 242mm |
| Height | 100mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60-20% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 101.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce3 Ti 200 costs 82.5% less ($231 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 72400% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-83% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 72.5+72400% |
| Codename | TU104 | GA104 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #94 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce3 Ti 200 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
