GRID K240Q vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

GRID K240Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

2012Core: 928 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GRID K240Q

225

2,541

+0.6%

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

110

2,525

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID K240Q is positioned at rank #210 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K240Q

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

99%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

97%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

96%

#195

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2908%

#210

GRID K240Q

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

100%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

99%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

99%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

98%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

97%

#219

FirePro W7000 Adapter

MSRP: $899|Avg: $15

96%

#220

Quadro K420

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

95%

#223

FirePro W7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $50

94%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID K240Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

Insight	GRID K240Q	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 32.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID K240Q	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+32.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID K240Q Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID K240Q and GeForce GTX 650 Ti

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti reaches 2,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti).

Feature	GRID K240Q	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
G3D Mark Score	2,541	2,525
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+61%	1.425 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	128 KB+100%	64 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K240Q	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K240Q) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) — the GRID K240Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K240Q	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K240Q) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	GRID K240Q	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
DirectX	11_0	11.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti).

Feature	GRID K240Q	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Encoder	—	NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder	—	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti's 110W — a 68.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.

Feature	GRID K240Q	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
TDP	225W	110W-51%
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	145mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70-13%
Perf/Watt	11.3	23.0+104%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID K240Q launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti launched at $149 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.5 (GRID K240Q) vs 84.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers 32.6% better value. The GRID K240Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).