GRID K240Q vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K240Q vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K240Q vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (2,637 vs 2,541), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K240Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K240Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K240Q vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GRID K240Q	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	2,541	2,637+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+300%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+140%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K240Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GRID K240Q	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K240Q and 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.

Feature	GRID K240Q	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K240Q) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	GRID K240Q	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	11_0	11.0
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GRID K240Q	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	—	PureVideo HD
Decoder	—	VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GRID K240Q	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
TDP	225W	100W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	11.3	26.4+134%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID K240Q (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	GRID K240Q	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MSRP	$500	—
Codename	GK104	GF114
Release	June 28 2013	March 22 2012
Ranking	#628	#704

Search GRID K240Q on Amazon

Search MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.