GRID K240Q vs GeForce RTX 3060
GRID K240Q
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID K240Q is positioned at rank #210 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K240Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID K240Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 568.8% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K240Q.
| Insight | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-568.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+568.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID K240Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $289 for the GeForce RTX 3060, it costs 86% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K240Q and GeForce RTX 3060
GRID K240Q
The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID K240Q scores 2,541 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 568.8%. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,541 | 16,995+569% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3584+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+457% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 3.5 MB+2592% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K240Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K240Q) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 Ultimate+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | — | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 170W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.3 | 100.0+785% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K240Q launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The GRID K240Q costs 86.2% less ($249 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.5 (GRID K240Q) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GRID K240Q offers 8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $329-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-86% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.5+8% | 58.8 |
| Codename | GK104 | GA106 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #628 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K240Q and GeForce RTX 3060
