GRID K240Q vs Radeon Ryzen 5 150

GRID K240Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 150

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID K240Q vs Radeon Ryzen 5 150 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon Ryzen 5 150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 42.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon Ryzen 5 150

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 45.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (2,595 vs 2,541), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID K240Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Ryzen 5 150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 45.9% (7.4 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K240Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon Ryzen 5 150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 150

The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 512 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 150).

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 5 150
G3D Mark Score
2,541
2,595+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+200%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS+89%
1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 5 150
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K240Q and System on the Radeon Ryzen 5 150.

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 5 150
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 150's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 5 150
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
11.3
51.9+359%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K240Q came in at $500, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon Ryzen 5 150 was 30% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GRID K240Q) vs 7.4 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 offers 45.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 5 150 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP
$500
$350-30%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
7.4+45%
Codename
GK104
Lexa
Release
June 28 2013
April 20 2017
Ranking
#628
#617

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.