
GRID K240Q

Radeon HD 8770
GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8770 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8770 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K240Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 242% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K240Q
The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,541 | 2,607+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+261% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K240Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K240Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the GRID K240Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K240Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 240mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.3 | 52.1+361% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K240Q came in at $500, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 70% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GRID K240Q) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 241.2% better value.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 17.4+241% |
| Codename | GK104 | Mars |
| Release | June 28 2013 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #628 | #844 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














