GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8770

GRID K240Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8770

2013Core: 775 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8770 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8770

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 242% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8770 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (2,607 vs 2,541), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID K240Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $350 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 242% (17.4 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K240Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon HD 8770
G3D Mark Score
2,541
2,607+3%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS+261%
0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon HD 8770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K240Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K240Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the GRID K240Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon HD 8770
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K240Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon HD 8770
DirectX
11_0
12_0+9%
Max Displays
0
3
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon HD 8770
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
240mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
11.3
52.1+361%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K240Q came in at $500, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 70% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GRID K240Q) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 241.2% better value.

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon HD 8770
MSRP
$500
$150-70%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
17.4+241%
Codename
GK104
Mars
Release
June 28 2013
April 1 2013
Ranking
#628
#844

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.