GRID K240Q vs GeForce GTX 950A
GRID K240Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 950A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K240Q is positioned at rank 210 and the GeForce GTX 950A is on rank 286, so the GRID K240Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K240Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 950A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K240Q.
| Insight | GRID K240Q | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 36.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K240Q | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+36.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K240Q and GeForce GTX 950A
GRID K240Q
The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.
GeForce GTX 950A
The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the GeForce GTX 950A reaches 2,599 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 950A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950A). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,541 | 2,599+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+140% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+59% | 1.439 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 950A's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.3 | 34.7+207% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K240Q launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 950A costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.5 (GRID K240Q) vs 86.6 (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 36.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 950A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $159-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.5 | 86.6+36% |
| Codename | GK104 | GM107 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #628 | #621 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K240Q and GeForce GTX 950A
