
GRID K240Q

Radeon Pro WX 3100
GRID K240Q vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K240Q vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID K240Q vs Radeon Pro WX 3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K240Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌151.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 13.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
Radeon Pro WX 3100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 155.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K240Q vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K240Q
The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon Pro WX 3100
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 reaches 2,584 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,541 | 2,584+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+200% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+83% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K240Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K240Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3100.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K240Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (12_0)+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | — | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3100's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.3 | 39.8+252% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K240Q came in at $500, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 3100 was 60.2% cheaper ($301 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GRID K240Q) vs 13.0 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) — the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers 154.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3100 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $199-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 13.0+155% |
| Codename | GK104 | Lexa |
| Release | June 28 2013 | June 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #628 | #624 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














