GRID K240Q vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G

GRID K240Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID K240Q vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 67.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 423.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 43W.

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 68% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 43W instead of 225W, a 182W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (2,553 vs 2,541), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 68% (8.5 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,553 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G reaches 2,553 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G).

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 7 4700G
G3D Mark Score
2,541
2,553
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1536
1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS
16.49 TFLOPS+620%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128+14%
112
L1 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 7 4700G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K240Q and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 7 4700G
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G's 43W — a 135.8% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 300W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 7 4700G
TDP
225W
43W-81%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
11.3
59.4+426%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K240Q came in at $500, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G launched at $299. On MSRP, Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G was 40.2% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GRID K240Q) vs 8.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G offers 66.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID K240QRadeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP
$500
$299-40%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
8.5+67%
Codename
GK104
Navi 33
Release
June 28 2013
August 8 2025
Ranking
#628
#229

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.