GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6950

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 275mm, a 274mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
67.2% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 8.7 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6950

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌27400% longer card at 275mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6950 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (2,593 vs 2,541), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K240Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6950 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 70.6% (8.7 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K240Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 6950

The Radeon HD 6950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K240Q scores 2,541 and the Radeon HD 6950 reaches 2,593 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K240Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6950 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K240Q) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6950). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6950).

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6950
G3D Mark Score	2,541	2,593+2%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+9%	1408
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+2%	2.253 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+45%	88
L1 Cache	128 KB	352 KB+175%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6950
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K240Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6950 carries 1 GB. GRID K240Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K240Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6950.

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6950
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K240Q) vs 11_2 (Radeon HD 6950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6950
DirectX	11_0	11_2
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K240Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6950's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon HD 6950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K240Q) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6950
TDP	225W	200W-11%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	1mm	275mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.3	13.0+15%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K240Q came in at $500, while the Radeon HD 6950 launched at $299. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6950 was 40.2% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GRID K240Q) vs 8.7 (Radeon HD 6950) — the Radeon HD 6950 offers 70.6% better value. The newer card here is GRID K240Q (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GRID K240Q	Radeon HD 6950
MSRP	$500	$299-40%
Performance per Dollar	5.1	8.7+71%
Codename	GK104	Cayman
Release	June 28 2013	December 14 2010
Ranking	#628	#623

Search GRID K240Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6950 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.